↓ Skip to main content

Cell-type heterogeneity: Why we should adjust for it in epigenome and biomarker studies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell-type heterogeneity: Why we should adjust for it in epigenome and biomarker studies
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13148-022-01253-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luo Qi, Andrew E. Teschendorff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 57%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,484,934
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#757
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,664
of 441,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.