You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of the evidence sources applied to cost-effectiveness analyses for older women with primary breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-022-00342-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yubo Wang, Sean P. Gavan, Douglas Steinke, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Li-Chia Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,410,791
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#221
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,626
of 443,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.