You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing a measure of provider adherence to improve the implementation of behavioral health services in primary care: a Delphi study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gregory P Beehler, Jennifer S Funderburk, Kyle Possemato, Christina L Vair |
Abstract |
The integration of behavioral health services into primary care is increasingly popular, yet fidelity of implementation in this area has been infrequently assessed due to the few measurement tools available. A sentinel indicator of fidelity of implementation is provider adherence, or utilization of prescribed procedures and engagement in model-specific behaviors. This study aimed to develop the first self-report measure of behavioral health provider adherence for co-located, collaborative care, a commonly adopted model of behavioral health service delivery in primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 26% |
Unknown | 14 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 25% |
Psychology | 21 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,837,421
of 24,036,420 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,492
of 1,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,182
of 294,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#37
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,036,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.