↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors associated with short-term adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors associated with short-term adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases
Published in
BMC Medicine, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12916-022-02310-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luuk Wieske, Laura Y. L. Kummer, Koos P. J. van Dam, Eileen W. Stalman, Anneke J. van der Kooi, Joost Raaphorst, Mark Löwenberg, R. Bart Takkenberg, Adriaan G. Volkers, Geert R. A. M. D’Haens, Sander W. Tas, Phyllis I. Spuls, Marcel W. Bekkenk, Annelie H. Musters, Nicoline F. Post, Angela L. Bosma, Marc L. Hilhorst, Yosta Vegting, Frederike J. Bemelman, Joep Killestein, Zoé L. E. van Kempen, Alexandre E. Voskuyl, Bo Broens, Agner Parra Sanchez, Gertjan Wolbink, Laura Boekel, Abraham Rutgers, Karina de Leeuw, Barbara Horváth, Jan J. G. M. Verschuuren, Annabel M. Ruiter, Lotte van Ouwerkerk, Diane van der Woude, Cornelia F. Allaart, Y. K. Onno Teng, Pieter van Paassen, Matthias H. Busch, B. Papay Jallah, Esther Brusse, Pieter A. van Doorn, Adája E. Baars, Dirkjan Hijnen, Corine R. G. Schreurs, W. Ludo van der Pol, H. Stephan Goedee, Maurice Steenhuis, Theo Rispens, Anja ten Brinke, Niels J. M. Verstegen, Koos A. H. Zwinderman, S. Marieke van Ham, Taco W. Kuijpers, Filip Eftimov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 34 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 36 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,474,939
of 23,877,717 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,037
of 3,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,200
of 429,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#22
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,877,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.