You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A signature of saliva-derived exosomal small RNAs as predicting biomarker for esophageal carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Cancer, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12943-022-01499-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kai Li, Yusheng Lin, Yichen Luo, Xiao Xiong, Lu Wang, Kameron Durante, Junkuo Li, Fuyou Zhou, Yi Guo, Shaobin Chen, Yuping Chen, Dianzheng Zhang, Sai-Ching Jim Yeung, Hao Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
Unspecified | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 22% |
Unspecified | 5 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#496,531
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#23
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,251
of 509,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.