↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasonic evaluation of the abductor hallucis muscle in hallux valgus: a cross-sectional observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasonic evaluation of the abductor hallucis muscle in hallux valgus: a cross-sectional observational study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Stewart, Richard Ellis, Mike Heath, Keith Rome

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the abductor hallucis muscle characteristics, defined as dorso-plantar (DP) thickness, medio-lateral (ML) width, and cross-sectional area (CSA) in relation to the severity of hallux valgus using musculoskeletal ultrasound. One hundred and two feet, mean (SD) age of 60.3 (20.54) years old, displaying varying severities of hallux valgus were stratified into four groups representing the four grades of the Manchester Scale (grade 0: no deformity, grade 1: mild deformity, grade 2: moderate deformity and grade 3: severe deformity).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 22%
Sports and Recreations 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,699,995
of 24,865,967 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,303
of 4,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,502
of 293,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#51
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,865,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.