You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-022-00120-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandra Recio-Saucedo, Ksenia Crane, Katie Meadmore, Kathryn Fackrell, Hazel Church, Simon Fraser, Amanda Blatch-Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,099,636
of 24,865,967 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#88
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,902
of 434,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,865,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.