↓ Skip to main content

Impact of different cover letter content and incentives on non-response bias in a sample of Veterans applying for Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits: a randomized, 3X2X2 factorial…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of different cover letter content and incentives on non-response bias in a sample of Veterans applying for Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits: a randomized, 3X2X2 factorial trial
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01531-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maureen Murdoch, Barbara A. Clothier, Timothy J. Beebe, Ann K. Bangerter, Siamak Noorbaloochi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 18 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Unspecified 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,819,772
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,143
of 2,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,249
of 432,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.