↓ Skip to main content

The impact of MTHFR 677C → T risk knowledge on changes in folate intake: findings from the Food4Me study

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of MTHFR 677C → T risk knowledge on changes in folate intake: findings from the Food4Me study
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12263-016-0539-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare B. O’Donovan, Marianne C. Walsh, Hannah Forster, Clara Woolhead, Carlos Celis-Morales, Rosalind Fallaize, Anna L. Macready, Cyril F. M. Marsaux, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Rodrigo San-Cristobal, Silvia Kolossa, Christina Mavrogianni, Christina P. Lambrinou, George Moschonis, Magdalena Godlewska, Agnieszka Surwillo, Jildau Bouwman, Keith Grimaldi, Iwona Traczyk, Christian A. Drevon, Hannelore Daniel, Yannis Manios, J. Alfredo Martinez, Wim H. M. Saris, Julie A. Lovegrove, John C. Mathers, Michael J. Gibney, Lorraine Brennan, Eileen R. Gibney

Abstract

It is hypothesised that individuals with knowledge of their genetic risk are more likely to make health-promoting dietary and lifestyle changes. The present study aims to test this hypothesis using data from the Food4Me study. This was a 6-month Internet-based randomised controlled trial conducted across seven centres in Europe where individuals received either general healthy eating advice or varying levels of personalised nutrition advice. Participants who received genotype-based personalised advice were informed whether they had the risk (CT/TT) (n = 178) or non-risk (CC) (n = 141) alleles of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene in relation to cardiovascular health and the importance of a sufficient intake of folate. General linear model analysis was used to assess changes in folate intake between the MTHFR risk, MTHFR non-risk and control groups from baseline to month 6 of the intervention. There were no differences between the groups for age, gender or BMI. However, there was a significant difference in country distribution between the groups (p = 0.010). Baseline folate intakes were 412 ± 172, 391 ± 190 and 410 ± 186 μg per 10 MJ for the risk, non-risk and control groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the three groups in terms of changes in folate intakes from baseline to month 6. Similarly, there were no changes in reported intake of food groups high in folate. These results suggest that knowledge of MTHFR 677C → T genotype did not improve folate intake in participants with the risk variant compared with those with the non-risk variant. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01530139.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,862,678
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#220
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,586
of 322,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.