↓ Skip to main content

Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for dementia (iCST): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for dementia (iCST): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Orrell, Lauren A Yates, Alistair Burns, Ian Russell, Robert T Woods, Zoe Hoare, Esme Moniz-Cook, Catherine Henderson, Martin Knapp, Aimee Spector, Vasiliki Orgeta

Abstract

Improving the quality of care for people with dementia and their carers has become a national priority in many countries. Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) groups can be beneficial in improving cognition and quality of life for people with dementia. The aim of the current study is to develop and evaluate a home-based individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (iCST) programme for people with dementia which can be delivered by their family carer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 158 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 40 25%