↓ Skip to main content

Human resource governance: what does governance mean for the health workforce in low- and middle-income countries?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human resource governance: what does governance mean for the health workforce in low- and middle-income countries?
Published in
Human Resources for Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Avril D Kaplan, Sarah Dominis, John GH Palen, Estelle E Quain

Abstract

Research on practical and effective governance of the health workforce is limited. This paper examines health system strengthening as it occurs in the intersection between the health workforce and governance by presenting a framework to examine health workforce issues related to eight governance principles: strategic vision, accountability, transparency, information, efficiency, equity/fairness, responsiveness and citizen voice and participation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 290 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 13%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Unspecified 15 5%
Other 77 25%
Unknown 40 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 25%
Social Sciences 49 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 40 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 4%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 48 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,197,388
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#378
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,834
of 309,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.