You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ultraprotective versus apneic ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a physiological study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-022-00604-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter T. Graf, Christoph Boesing, Isabel Brumm, Jonas Biehler, Kei Wieland Müller, Manfred Thiel, Paolo Pelosi, Patricia R. M. Rocco, Thomas Luecke, Joerg Krebs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 12% |
Brazil | 2 | 12% |
Japan | 2 | 12% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 38% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,037,644
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#97
of 557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,490
of 433,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.