You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in the retrosternal reconstruction after esophagectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Surgery, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12893-022-01544-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leo Yamada, Motonobu Saito, Hiroya Suzuki, Shotaro Mochizuki, Eisei Endo, Koji Kase, Misato Ito, Hiroshi Nakano, Naoto Yamauchi, Takuro Matsumoto, Akinao Kaneta, Yasuyuki Kanke, Hisashi Onozawa, Hiroyuki Hanayama, Hirokazu Okayama, Shotaro Fujita, Wataru Sakamoto, Yohei Watanabe, Suguru Hayase, Zenichiro Saze, Tomoyuki Momma, Shinji Ohki, Koji Kono |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,591,482
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#136
of 1,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,656
of 440,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,347 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.