You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shedding light on walking in the dark: the effects of reduced lighting on the gait of older adults with a higher-level gait disorder and controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-2-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anat Kesler, Gregory Leibovich, Talia Herman, Leor Gruendlinger, Nir Giladi, Jeffrey M Hausdorff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Psychology | 11 | 14% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,691,910
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#856
of 1,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,128
of 59,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.