↓ Skip to main content

Improving adherence to web-based cessation programs: a randomized controlled trial study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving adherence to web-based cessation programs: a randomized controlled trial study protocol
Published in
Trials, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda L Graham, Sarah Cha, George D Papandonatos, Nathan K Cobb, Aaron Mushro, Ye Fang, Raymond S Niaura, David B Abrams

Abstract

Reducing smoking prevalence is a public health priority that can save more lives and money than almost any other known preventive intervention. Internet interventions have the potential for enormous public health impact given their broad reach and effectiveness. However, most users engage only minimally with even the best designed websites, diminishing their impact due to an insufficient 'dose'. Two approaches to improve adherence to Internet cessation programs are integrating smokers into an online social network and providing free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Active participation in online communities is associated with higher rates of cessation. Integrating smokers into an online social network can increase support and may also increase utilization of cessation tools and NRT. Removing barriers to NRT may increase uptake and adherence, and may also increase use of online cessation tools as smokers look for information and support while quitting. The combination of both strategies may exert the most powerful effects on adherence compared to either strategy alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 123 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Psychology 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 37 28%