Title |
Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with piezosurgery versus oscillating saw and chisel osteotomy - a randomized prospective trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-49 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Majeed Rana, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Madiha Rana, Jozsef Piffkó, Wolfgang Kater |
Abstract |
Ultrasonic bone-cutting surgery has been introduced as a feasible alternative to the conventional sharp instruments used in craniomaxillofacial surgery because of its precision and safety. The piezosurgery medical device allows the efficient cutting of mineralized tissues with minimal trauma to soft tissues. Piezoelectric osteotome has found its role in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME), a procedure well established to correct transverse maxillary discrepancies. The advantages include minimal risk to critical anatomic structures. The purpose of this clinical comparative study (CIS 2007-237-M) was to present the advantages of the piezoelectric cut as a minimally invasive device in surgically assisted, rapid maxillary expansion by protecting the maxillary sinus mucosal lining. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Other | 32 | 23% |
Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 58% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 33 | 24% |