You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The study of anthropometric estimates in the visceral fat of healthy individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun-Hao Chen, Yu-Yawn Chen, Chih-Lin Chuang, Li-Ming Chiang, Shu-Min Chiao, Kuen-Chang Hsieh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,763,732
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#770
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,034
of 227,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.