You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical translation of patient-derived tumour organoids- bottlenecks and strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomarker Research, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40364-022-00356-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malia Alexandra Foo, Mingliang You, Shing Leng Chan, Gautam Sethi, Glenn K. Bonney, Wei-Peng Yong, Edward Kai-Hua Chow, Eliza Li Shan Fong, Lingzhi Wang, Boon-Cher Goh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,653,698
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Biomarker Research
#67
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,785
of 440,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomarker Research
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.