↓ Skip to main content

Species and genotypic diversity of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from children investigated for pulmonary tuberculosis in rural Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species and genotypic diversity of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from children investigated for pulmonary tuberculosis in rural Uganda
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benon B Asiimwe, Godwins B Bagyenzi, Willy Ssengooba, Francis Mumbowa, Gerald Mboowa, Anne Wajja, Harriet Mayanja-Kiiza, Philippa M Musoke, Eric Wobudeya, Gunilla Kallenius, Moses L Joloba

Abstract

Smear microscopy, a mainstay of tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in developing countries, cannot differentiate M. tuberculosis complex from NTM infection, while pulmonary TB shares clinical signs with NTM disease, causing clinical and diagnostic dilemmas. This study used molecular assays to identify species and assess genotypic diversity of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates from children investigated for pulmonary tuberculosis at a demographic surveillance site in rural eastern Uganda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Other 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,162,589
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,744
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,226
of 192,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#82
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.