↓ Skip to main content

Tackling overweight and obesity: does the public health message match the science?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
74 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tackling overweight and obesity: does the public health message match the science?
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Hafekost, David Lawrence, Francis Mitrou, Therese A O'Sullivan, Stephen R Zubrick

Abstract

Despite the increasing understanding of the mechanisms relating to weight loss and maintenance, there are currently no validated public health interventions that are able to achieve sustained long-term weight loss or to stem the increasing prevalence of obesity in the population. We aimed to examine the models of energy balance underpinning current research about weight-loss intervention from the field of public health, and to determine whether they are consistent with the model provided by basic science. EMBASE was searched for papers published in 2011 on weight-loss interventions. We extracted details of the population, nature of the intervention, and key findings for 27 articles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 165 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 13 8%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Social Sciences 20 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Psychology 13 8%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 32 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#592,136
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#433
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,770
of 205,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#12
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.