You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the quality of online patient information at the intersection of complementary and alternative medicine and hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Hypertension, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40885-021-00193-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremy Y. Ng, Jane Jomy, Alexandra Vacca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Hypertension
#36
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,601
of 450,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Hypertension
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them