↓ Skip to main content

Exaggerated false positives by popular differential expression methods when analyzing human population samples

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
284 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exaggerated false positives by popular differential expression methods when analyzing human population samples
Published in
Genome Biology, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13059-022-02648-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yumei Li, Xinzhou Ge, Fanglue Peng, Wei Li, Jingyi Jessica Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 284 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 23%
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 72 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 14%
Computer Science 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 74 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#223,228
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#71
of 4,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,733
of 453,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#1
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.