You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Innovation of strip fertilization planting for rice straw crushing with back-throwing and interrow-laying
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-022-00862-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yinyan Shi, Ye Jiang, Xiaochan Wang, Haiming Yu, Hui Liu, Jingbo Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,869,783
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#976
of 1,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,259
of 443,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#44
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.