↓ Skip to main content

Trans-acting genetic variants causing multilocus imprinting disturbance (MLID): common mechanisms and consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trans-acting genetic variants causing multilocus imprinting disturbance (MLID): common mechanisms and consequences
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13148-022-01259-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Eggermann, Elzem Yapici, Jet Bliek, Arrate Pereda, Matthias Begemann, Silvia Russo, Pierpaola Tannorella, Luciano Calzari, Guiomar Perez de Nanclares, Paola Lombardi, I. Karen Temple, Deborah Mackay, Andrea Riccio, Masayo Kagami, Tsutomu Ogata, Pablo Lapunzina, David Monk, Eamonn R. Maher, Zeynep Tümer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Unknown 21 72%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 66%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,730,223
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#880
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,634
of 443,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#25
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.