↓ Skip to main content

Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Hoefsmit, Angelique de Rijk, Inge Houkes

Abstract

Return to work (RTW) after sick leave is considered necessary to support the employees' health. Cooperation between employees and employers may encourage employees' RTW, but is hampered by bottlenecks that we do not completely understand. Dutch legislation means to support this cooperation and allows trying RTW during two years. The Resource Dependence Institutional Cooperation (RDIC) model has been developed for studying cooperation in public health. Study aims were to get insight into the degree of cooperation between Dutch sick-listed employees and employers, how this (lack of) cooperation can be understood, and how valid the RDIC model is for understanding this (lack of) cooperation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 27 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Engineering 4 13%
Psychology 4 13%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#4,935,995
of 10,502,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,899
of 7,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,246
of 124,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#144
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,502,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 52nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.