↓ Skip to main content

Measuring xylem hydraulic vulnerability for long-vessel species: an improved methodology with the flow centrifugation technique

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 942)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring xylem hydraulic vulnerability for long-vessel species: an improved methodology with the flow centrifugation technique
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13595-022-01124-0
Authors

Régis Burlett, Camille Parise, Gaëlle Capdeville, Hervé Cochard, Laurent J. Lamarque, Andrew King, Sylvain Delzon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,685,178
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#25
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,546
of 462,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.