↓ Skip to main content

Influence of accessibility and distance in the consumption of disposable equipment in a hemodialysis unit

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of accessibility and distance in the consumption of disposable equipment in a hemodialysis unit
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-s2-p60
Authors

Antonio Torres-Quintana, M Teresa Icart-Isern, Cristina Esquinas-López

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,730,223
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,719
of 7,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,000
of 227,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#81
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.