You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cationic lipid mediated CRISPR/Cas9 technique for the production of stable genome edited citrus plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-022-00870-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lamiaa M. Mahmoud, Prabhjot Kaur, Daniel Stanton, Jude W. Grosser, Manjul Dutt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| India | 2 | 14% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,542,433
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#186
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,451
of 463,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#13
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.