↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 2003
DOI 10.1186/cc2339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gavin D Perkins, Daniel F McAuley, Simon Giles, Helen Routledge, Fang Gao

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Other 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 56%
Engineering 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 22 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,685,260
of 22,559,301 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,664
of 6,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,919
of 129,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,559,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.