↓ Skip to main content

Causes of different goiter rates with the same iodine deficiency among the pastoral and agricultural populations of Tibet: a geographical comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Thyroid Research, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causes of different goiter rates with the same iodine deficiency among the pastoral and agricultural populations of Tibet: a geographical comparison
Published in
Thyroid Research, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13044-022-00122-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Xu, Shichuan Liu, Wei Ma, Xiuwei Li, Min Guo, Xiaoxiao Cao, Yunyou Gu, Haiyan Wang, Jianqiang Wang, Ying Zhang, Guangxiu Zhuang, Liejun Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#20,784,866
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from Thyroid Research
#157
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,739
of 440,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thyroid Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.