You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
H2O2-responsive VEGF/NGF gene co-delivery nano-system achieves stable vascularization in ischemic hindlimbs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01328-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Youlu Chen, Zuoguan Chen, Jianwei Duan, Liang Gui, Huiyang Li, Xiaoyu Liang, Xinxin Tian, Kaijing Liu, Yongjun Li, Jing Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,749,545
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#432
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,109
of 440,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#36
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.