You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personalization of renal replacement therapy initiation: a secondary analysis of the AKIKI and IDEAL-ICU trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03936-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Grolleau, Raphaël Porcher, Saber Barbar, David Hajage, Abderrahmane Bourredjem, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Didier Dreyfuss, Stéphane Gaudry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 10 | 17% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Honduras | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 56% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#976,196
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#755
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,399
of 446,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#22
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.