You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
School-age effects of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program for preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction: preliminary findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gloria McAnulty, Frank H Duffy, Sandra Kosta, Neil I Weisenfeld, Simon K Warfield, Samantha C Butler, Moona Alidoost, Jane Holmes Bernstein, Richard Robertson, David Zurakowski, Heidelise Als |
| Abstract |
The experience in the newborn intensive care nursery results in premature infants' neurobehavioral and neurophysiological dysfunction and poorer brain structure. Preterms with severe intrauterine growth restriction are doubly jeopardized given their compromised brains. The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program improved outcome at early school-age for preterms with appropriate intrauterine growth. It also showed effectiveness to nine months for preterms with intrauterine growth restriction. The current study tested effectiveness into school-age for preterms with intrauterine growth restriction regarding executive function (EF), electrophysiology (EEG) and neurostructure (MRI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 213 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 24% |
| Psychology | 37 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,357,460
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#509
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,839
of 195,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.