↓ Skip to main content

Saliva collection via capillary method may underestimate arboviral transmission by mosquitoes

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saliva collection via capillary method may underestimate arboviral transmission by mosquitoes
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13071-022-05198-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Gloria-Soria, D. E. Brackney, P. M. Armstrong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Unspecified 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,581,829
of 25,487,317 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,119
of 6,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,587
of 446,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#39
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,487,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.