You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Innovative and conventional “conservative” technologies for the treatment of uterine fibroids in Italy: a multidimensional assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-022-00367-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Ferrario, E. Garagiola, C. Gerardi, G. Bellavia, S. Colombo, C. Ticca, C. Rossetti, M. Ciboldi, M. Meroni, A. Vanzulli, A. Rampoldi, T. Bignardi, F. Arrigoni, E. Porazzi, E. Foglia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,892,644
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#337
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338,662
of 469,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.