You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nasal pressure swings as the measure of inspiratory effort in spontaneously breathing patients with de novo acute respiratory failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03938-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roberto Tonelli, Andrea Cortegiani, Alessandro Marchioni, Riccardo Fantini, Luca Tabbì, Ivana Castaniere, Emanuela Biagioni, Stefano Busani, Chiara Nani, Caterina Cerbone, Morgana Vermi, Filippo Gozzi, Giulia Bruzzi, Linda Manicardi, Maria Rosaria Pellegrino, Bianca Beghè, Massimo Girardis, Paolo Pelosi, Cesare Gregoretti, Lorenzo Ball, Enrico Clini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 3 | 11% |
Colombia | 2 | 7% |
France | 2 | 7% |
Portugal | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,661,856
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,455
of 6,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,345
of 447,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.