You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic performance and comparison of ultrasensitive and conventional rapid diagnostic test, thick blood smear and quantitative PCR for detection of low-density Plasmodium falciparum infections during a controlled human malaria infection study in Equatorial Guinea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04103-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maxmillian Mpina, Thomas C. Stabler, Tobias Schindler, Jose Raso, Anna Deal, Ludmila Acuche Pupu, Elizabeth Nyakarungu, Maria del Carmen Ovono Davis, Vicente Urbano, Ali Mtoro, Ali Hamad, Maria Silvia A. Lopez, Beltran Pasialo, Marta Alene Owono Eyang, Matilde Riloha Rivas, Carlos Cortes Falla, Guillermo A. García, Juan Carlos Momo, Raul Chuquiyauri, Elizabeth Saverino, L. W. Preston Church, B. Kim lee Sim, Bonifacio Manguire, Marcel Tanner, Carl Maas, Salim Abdulla, Peter F. Billingsley, Stephen L. Hoffman, Said Jongo, Thomas L. Richie, Claudia A. Daubenberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,770,965
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,751
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,000
of 432,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#44
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.