You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Young fibroblast-derived exosomal microRNA-125b transfers beneficial effects on aged cutaneous wound healing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01348-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenzheng Xia, Minxiong Li, Xingyu Jiang, Xin Huang, Shuchen Gu, Jiaqi Ye, Liaoxiang Zhu, Meng Hou, Tao Zan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,232,420
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#611
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,146
of 441,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#48
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.