↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of non-invasive recording of somatosensory evoked potential in pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Laboratory Animal Research, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility of non-invasive recording of somatosensory evoked potential in pigs
Published in
Laboratory Animal Research, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s42826-022-00118-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume L. Hoareau, Angela Peters, David Hilgart, Marta Iversen, Gregory Clark, Matthew Zabriskie, Viola Rieke, Candace Floyd, Lubdha Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 18%
Engineering 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Laboratory Animal Research
#97
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,434
of 446,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Laboratory Animal Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.