You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical and regulatory implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the medical devices industry and its representatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00771-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brette Blakely, Wendy Rogers, Jane Johnson, Quinn Grundy, Katrina Hutchison, Robyn Clay-Williams, Bernadette Richards, Guy Maddern |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#13,824,947
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#722
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,656
of 441,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.