You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nanocarrier cancer therapeutics with functional stimuli-responsive mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01364-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neha Kaushik, Shweta B. Borkar, Sondavid K. Nandanwar, Pritam Kumar Panda, Eun Ha Choi, Nagendra Kumar Kaushik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 95% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 9 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 60 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,370,192
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#48
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,881
of 449,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.