You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Re-visiting the relationship between neighbourhood environment and BMI: an instrumental variables approach to correcting for residential selection bias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathleen D Zick, Heidi Hanson, Jessie X Fan, Ken R Smith, Lori Kowaleski-Jones, Barbara B Brown, Ikuho Yamada |
| Abstract |
A burgeoning literature links attributes of neighbourhoods' built environments to residents' physical activity, food and transportation choices, weight, and/or obesity risk. In cross-sectional studies, non-random residential selection impedes researchers' ability to conclude that neighbourhood environments cause these outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 18% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,107,502
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#750
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,640
of 204,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.