You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethnomedicinal study of medicinal plants used by Mizo tribes in Champhai district of Mizoram, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-022-00520-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. B. C. Laldingliani, Nurpen Meitei Thangjam, R. Zomuanawma, Laldingngheti Bawitlung, Anirban Pal, Awadhesh Kumar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,253,718
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#147
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,266
of 441,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.