You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of population of bacteria from culture negative surgical site infection patients using molecular tool
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Surgery, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12893-020-01016-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Himanshu Sekhar Behera, Nirupama Chayani, Madhusmita Bal, Hemant Kumar Khuntia, Sanghamitra Pati, Sashibhusan Das, Manoranjan Ranjit |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,915,937
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#52
of 1,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,722
of 503,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#3
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,347 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.