↓ Skip to main content

Utilization of amplicon-based targeted sequencing panel for the massively parallel sequencing of sporadic hearing impairment patients from Saudi Arabia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utilization of amplicon-based targeted sequencing panel for the massively parallel sequencing of sporadic hearing impairment patients from Saudi Arabia
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12881-016-0329-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashraf Dallol, Kamal Daghistani, Aisha Elaimi, Wissam A. Al-Wazani, Afaf Bamanie, Malek Safiah, Samira Sagaty, Layla Taha, Rawabi Zahed, Osama Bajouh, Adeel Gulzar Chaudhary, Mamdooh Abdullah Gari, Rola Turki, Mohammed Hussein Al-Qahtani, Adel Mohammed Abuzenadah

Abstract

Hearing Impairment (HI) can have genetic or environmental causes and in some cases, an interplay of both. Genetic causes are difficult to determine as mutations in more than 90 genes have been shown recently to be responsible for HI. Providing a genetic diagnostic test for HI is therefore a challenge especially for ethnic groups where GJB2 mutations are shown to be rare. Here we show the design and implementation of an amplicon-based targeted sequencing panel that allows the simultaneous sequencing of 87 HI genes. Mutations identified included known pathogenic mutations and novel variants with unknown significance. The diagnostic rate of this panel is 28 % when only pathogenic variants were reported. However, an additional 28 % harbored recurrent combinations of novel or rare single nucleotide variants in the OTOF or PCDH15 genes. Such combinations were not identified in healthy individuals. Targeted sequencing approach is a very useful strategy for the identification of mutations affecting the HI genes because of its relatively fast turn-around time and cost effectiveness compared to whole-exome sequencing. Further novel or rare variants could be identified by implementing a large-scale screening of HI using our panel which will eventual lead to a higher diagnostic rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#894
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,294
of 327,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.