You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proceedings of Patient Reported Outcome Measure’s (PROMs) Conference Sheffield 2016: advances in patient reported outcomes research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-016-0540-5 |
| Authors |
Tim Croudace, John Brazier, Nils Gutacker, Andrew Street, Dan Robotham, Samantha Waterman, Diana Rose, Safarina Satkunanathan, Til Wykes, Nasrin Nasr, Pamela Enderby, Jill Carlton, Donna Rowen, Jackie Elliott, John Brazier, Katherine Stevens, Hasan Basarir, Alex Labeit, Mairead Murphy, Sandra Hollinghurst, Chris Salisbury, Dominic Marley, James Wilson, Amy Barrat, Bibhas Roy, Ines Rombach, Órlaith Burke, Crispin Jenkinson, Alastair Gray, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Ian Porter, Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli, Charlotte Bramwell, Jose M. Valderas, Patricia Holch, Susan Davidson, Jacki Routledge, Ann Henry, Kevin Franks, Alex Gilbert, Kate Absolom, Galina Velikova, Ian Porter, Jose M. Valderas, Jan R. Boehnke, Andrew Trigg, Ruth Howells, Jeshika Singh, Subhash Pokhrel, Louise Longworth, Caroline Potter, Cheryl Hunter, Laura Kelly, Elizabeth Gibbons, Julian Forder, Angela Coulter, Ray Fitzpatrick, Michele Peters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,146,998
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#919
of 2,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,502
of 328,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.