You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Valproic acid ameliorates coxsackievirus-B3-induced viral myocarditis by modulating Th17/Treg imbalance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12985-016-0626-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haibin Jin, Xiaoming Guo |
| Abstract |
Viral myocarditis, which is often caused by coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), is a serious clinical disorder characterized by excessive myocardial inflammation. Valproic acid (VPA) is described as a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has anti-inflammatory effects in several inflammatory diseases. However, the role and the detailed mechanism of VPA in viral myocarditis remain unclear. Experimental CVB3-induced myocarditis was induced in mice by intraperitoneally (i.p.) infected with CVB3. VPA was i.p. administered from day 0 to day 7. The survival, body weight loss, and myocarditis severity of mice were recorded. Th17 and Treg cells in spleen were analyzed by flow cytometry. Th17/Treg cell-related cytokine expressions were quantified by ELISA. The effect of VPA on Th17 and Treg cells differentiation was examined in vitro and in vivo. Administration of VPA significantly attenuated the clinical severity of myocarditis, and the overall mortality from CVB3-induced myocarditis. The infiltration of Th17 and Treg cells, as well as the serum level of related cytokines (IL-17A and IL-10), were increased in CVB3 infected mice. In addition, VPA decreased the percentage of splenic Th17 cells while increased the percentage of Treg cells. Moreover, VPA downregulated the expression of IL-17A and upregulated IL-10 in serum and heart tissues of CVB3 infected mice. Additionally, VPA directly inhibited the differentiation of Th17 cells and promoted both the differentiation and suppressive function of Treg cells in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that VPA may thus be a promising strategy in the therapy of viral myocarditis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,864,294
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,831
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,445
of 320,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.