↓ Skip to main content

Widely used, short 16S rRNA mitochondrial gene fragments yield poor and erratic results in phylogenetic estimation and species delimitation of amphibians

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Widely used, short 16S rRNA mitochondrial gene fragments yield poor and erratic results in phylogenetic estimation and species delimitation of amphibians
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12862-022-01994-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kin Onn Chan, Stefan T. Hertwig, Dario N. Neokleous, Jana M. Flury, Rafe M. Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Unspecified 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,653,513
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#582
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,021
of 429,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.