↓ Skip to main content

The effect of missing data and imputation on the detection of bias in cognitive testing using differential item functioning methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of missing data and imputation on the detection of bias in cognitive testing using differential item functioning methods
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01572-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Nichols, J. A. Deal, B. K. Swenor, A. G. Abraham, N. M. Armstrong, K. Bandeen-Roche, M. C. Carlson, M. Griswold, F. R. Lin, T. H. Mosley, P. Y. Ramulu, N. S. Reed, A. R. Sharrett, A. L. Gross

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 12 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Psychology 2 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,919,226
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,788
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,191
of 441,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#56
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.