↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of complicated visceral leishmaniasis in patients without HIV, North-West Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of complicated visceral leishmaniasis in patients without HIV, North-West Ethiopia
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1746-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aschalew Tamiru, Bethlehem Tigabu, Sisay Yifru, Ermias Diro, Asrat Hailu

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a protozoan disease that is invariably fatal if left untreated. The disease is found in 70 countries with incidence of 0.2 - 0.4 million cases. The mainstay of treatment in resource limited countries like Ethiopia is antimonials, while use of liposomal amphotericin B is reserved for treatment of complicated VL cases. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B in HIV negative VL patients diagnosed with complications. A retrospective chart review was conducted involving records of patients admitted between January 2009 and December 2014. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment outcome data were collected. The doses of liposomal amphotericin B and adverse events related to treatment were retrieved. Categorical and continuous variables respectively were analyzed by Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 147 patients with severe VL were treated with liposomal amphotericin B in total dose ranges of 20 mg/kg to 35 mg/kg. In the overall treatment outcome analysis, initial cure (30 days after start of treatment) was observed in 128 (87.1 %), treatment failures in 10 (6.8 %), interruptions in 2(1.4 %) and deaths in 7 (4.8 %) patients. Initial cure rate at high dose (24-35 mg/kg total dose) was 96.7 % (59/61) versus 80.2 % (69/86) at lower doses (<24 mg/kg); which was significantly higher (P < 0.01), OR = 4.56: 95 %, Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.17 - 20.78). Ten cases (11.8 %) of treatment failure occurred in the low dose treatment group. The most common adverse events (AEs) were hypokalemia in 39 cases (26.5 %) and infusion related reactions in 16 (10.9 %). The frequency of hypokalemia and infusion related reactions were not significantly different between the low and high dose liposomal amphotericin B. In HIV negative complicated VL patients, high dose of liposomal amphotericin B was found to have high cure rate at the end of treatment. The appropriate dose for better efficacy needs to be determined. Monitoring serum potassium level during treatment with liposomal amphotericin B should be an essential component of the clinical management of VL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 28 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,363,602
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,036
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,449
of 322,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#86
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.